A Farewell To Arms
Image / 1934 / 89 Minutes / Not Rated
Street date: August 31, 1999

Hemingway wrote complex, endearing novels wrapped in the guise of simplicity. A Farewell to Arms (1929) was one of his early successes. The movie version followed seven years later. Unfortunately Hemingway's writing style has not translated well to film. The film versions of For Whom the Bell Tolls (1943) and The Sun Also Rises (1957) both largely succeeded in capturing the visual flavor of the novels, but the characterizations often fell flat. To Have and Have Not (1944) does not really count since William Faulkner was one of the screenwriters.

I have not seen the 1957 version of Farewell to Arms, but I have my doubts about it since it featured Rock Hudson and Jennifer Jones and was produced by her husband, David O. Selznick, who had lost his magic touch years earlier. But these are most likely two completely different films, as the 1934 version is in black and white and only 87 minutes long, while the 1957 version is in color and 152 minutes long, which is almost enough time to film every page of the book.

American Frederic Henry (Gary Cooper) is an ambulance driver for the Italian army. He volunteered (the U.S. did not enter the war until 1917) during a time when war was considered a proving ground for men, rather than a playground for wholesale slaughter. On his sojourns away from the battle lines he carouses with the available women, often under the influence of delectable spirits. During one of his binges he briefly encounters a nurse named Catherine Barkley (Helen Hayes). She impresses him much more than he impresses her. Their next encounter is more fruitful. They converse, he rapes her, and she then pronounces her love for him. The relationship is further strengthened when Frederic is injured and recuperates in Catherine's hospital. When Frederic is sent back to the front he must decide whether his priorities are with the army or with Catherine, a decision that could result in execution for desertion.

Gary Cooper's stiffness makes him the wrong man to play Frederic. He is also too old. He was over 30 when he acted in this film, and his physical appearance and vocal maturity reflect his "advanced" age. Frederic should be a raw impetuous character, someone who has yet to fully experience life, but is crazy enough to enlist in a bloody war for the frontier stimulation.

This film version is too sentimental and weepy. Even worse, it is forgettable. I found myself having to think for a few seconds before I could remember how it ended, after having just watched it. Cooper and Hayes lack the chemistry necessary to drive this love story, ala Bogart and Bergman in Casablanca, or even Hawke and Delphy in Before Sunrise.

Hayes' Catherine displays some independence at the beginning of the film, but soon she surrenders herself utterly to Frederic. Evidently the rape swept her off her feet. Love at first sight, or love at first rape? The perfect gentleman, he even apologized for taking her virginity. What more could a girl want? Perhaps I misinterpreted this scene, but their language after the fade to black leaves no other viable interpretation. More perplexing is that the book does not intimate rape. So why would they add this interpretation to the film adaptation? Did the filmmakers believe that a rape would be more appropriate than casual sex? To have Catherine announce her love for Frederic immediately afterwards is absurd and demeaning.

The rape scene is not the only major difference between the movie and the book. The letter writing in the film is nothing more than a cinematic contrivance. The supporting characters are different too, with Rinaldi being little more than a weasel and Ferguson being much more intolerant of Frederic and Catherine's relationship. The movie also ignores a massive amount of Hemingway's dialogue, which is so key to believing and sympathizing with Frederic and Catherine's love for each other. Lastly, their entire time together in Switzerland is thrown away in favor of a last second entrance by Frederic.

The one admirable characteristic of this film is the cinematography, which deservedly won an Academy Award. While not shot in an epic fashion A Farewell to Arms does contain some impressive images. That being said, even though I greatly enjoy many black and white films, I believe Hemingway stories should be told in color. Only then can a film come close to capturing the visual splendor of Hemingway's pen.

According to the Internet Movie Database an alternate version of this film contains a different, "Americanized" ending. Yuck. It also lists the running time at only 80 minutes, which is likely the version that Madacy has released on dvd, although I do not know if this other dvd release has the original theatrical or the American ending. Whatever the case, this Image release seems to be the longer, original theatrical version of the film, as indicated by the back cover which says "due in part to censorship codes of the day, this theatrical version of the film has seldom been seen and was thought lost."

Video: How Does The Disc Look?

The image is rather clean for a film of this vintage. There is some clutter, but less than one would expect. It is a bit soft and somewhat grainy. If A Farewell to Arms is a public domain title, Image's release is probably as good as this movie will ever look.

Audio: How Does the Disc Sound?

Pop. Snap. (Editor: Hey, you forgot "crackle"!) Those sounds frequently interject themselves at various points in the movie. It makes the soundtrack seem quite the worse for wear. After the opening the volume becomes quieter, necessitating an increase in the volume to hear the dialogue, although the level is mostly constant after that. On the positive side, hiss is barely noticeable, and some bass is present for the explosions and the roar of truck engines.

Supplements: What Goodies Are There?

The scant extras are filmographies and some short award notes.

Parting Thoughts

Keep in mind that I think this is a public domain movie, which means that anyone with a print can distribute A Farewell to Arms (1934) on dvd. I doubt any of these other releases have comparable video quality to Image's release, so you will just have to weigh the cost versus quality when deciding which release to purchase.

Buy Guide

Video Quality

3 of 5

Audio Quality

2 0f 5

Supplements

1.5 of 5

Value / Price

2.5 of 5

» Discuss: Weigh in at the forum

 

DISC FEATURES

Specifications
- DVD-Video
- Single-Layer Disc
- Region 0

Aspect Ratio(s):
- 1.33:1 Full Frame

Dolby Digital Formats:
- English 1.0 Mono

DTS Formats:
- None

PCM Formats:
- None

Subtitles/Captions:
- None

Standard Features:
- Interactive Motion Menus
- Scene Access

Supplements:
- Cast Biographies

InterActual DVD-ROM Features:
- None

List Price:
- $24.95