 |
"Slashing Dressed To Kill"
» Brian De Palma, Nancy Allen and Keith Gordon discuss censorship.
(length: 1:40)
Menu preview
» Preview the menus from the 'Dressed To
Kill' special edition. (length: 0:45)
Theatrical trailer
» Watch the 'Dressed To Kill' theatrical
trailer. (length: 1:45)
|
 |
DF: I have a question I've always wondered about. There seems to be
certain directors who just haven't, won't or can't do audio commentaries.
If I'm not mistaken, De Palma has never done a commentary for any of his
films. Does he hate them? (laughs)
LB: No, actually, I've been talking to him about it. He likes
them. To be honest, when I got involved with Carrie and Dressed To Kill,
he was and is in Paris doing a new project, so just getting him for the
interviews was a stretch. It is a challenge when filmmakers are in production
or post-production to get them to come in and sit down for two hours and
do a commentary. But I've been talking with him about doing a number of
his other movies so I'm sure at some point it will happen.
But, in all honesty, I'm so not a fan of commentaries. I think especially
when you have an hour and a half worth of documentary footage on Carrie
and a solid hour on Dressed To Kill, I really don't see what else could
be said. I'm sure a lot, in one sense, but I experienced it on other titles
I've done. Some of the commentaries are great, but I just really don't
"get it." To me, it is redundant. I rather spend the money on
getting another interview in the can. I rather spend the money on another
featurette rather than a rehash of the same thing on a commentary.
DF: You may have a point, because commentaries are becoming ubiquitous
lately and some I've heard are really pretty terrible!
LB: Oh, I think I just did a couple of them! (laughs) I just went
through one with a director that is unusable. It's frightening. But if
I would have done it as an on-camera interview, I think it would have
been better and at least some of it may have ended up usable...
DF: That's actually an important point, because I think the reason
commentaries can be more hit or miss is because it is an all or nothing
deal...you can't just use certain parts. And I think a participant may
try a bit harder when they are in front of the camera?
LB: I personally can not blame the director who doesn't want to
do a commentary. I do documentaries, and I'm at the bottom of the barrel
of those who do visual work (laughs), so I can't imagine what it is like
when you've directed a movie and twenty years later you look at it again.
It is like looking at a picture of yourself when you were wearing bell
bottoms and had long hair and you're horrified! I think as much a movie
might have become a classic, it is really stirs so much up and it is really
hard to do. I think the best commentaries are those done for current movies,
or a commentary is made up of interviews where you match it up to the
film and edited it from various sources, like Criterion pioneered. It
is a tough thing. But, then, on the other hand you have some directors
who are terrific at it (recording commentaries.) With Brian, it was just
a question of timing. But I think in the future it will happen.
DF: Now, about those still galleries. There is some really great stuff
in there, especially on Dressed To Kill. How did you amass all that material?
LB: I got some help from MGM and the archives, and from a collector,
but with Dressed To Kill it is mainly my collection! The posters, the
ad slicks, all that stuff - I've had since I saw the movie and have been
collecting through the years.
DF: It's very impressive. You must have a big house! (laughs)
LB: It was fun to finally see the payoff for all that stuff that
has been collecting dust in the drawer all these years! But I am very
selective, I don't collect everything. Only certain directors, like Brian
De Palma and Steven Spielberg, where I collect all their stuff.
DF: I'd like to wrap up with another recent De Palma DVD you worked
on but is a film of his that doesn't get a lot of attention. Obsession
seems to have fallen between the cracks, so to speak, hasn't it?
LB: Obsession was an interesting story. It is one of my favorite
movies, but obviously not a huge box office draw at the time. It is one
of those De Palma movies that remains very obscure. It was a negative pickup
for Columbia, and when that happens, the studio usually only owns the
rights for the United States and Canada. So, for a while, I believe they
(Columbia) may not have owned the rights anymore, so I never really brought
it up as a project. Finally, I did, but the only way I managed to do it
was because I was doing a lot of other projects for Columbia so we managed
to do it on a very low budget. But it was really a treat because I think
that it is a movie that has disappeared from everyone's radar, so to speak.
But I think it is a classic, and especially within the body of work of
Brian De Palma. It is a thriller but at its core it is a sophisticated
love story, ultimately one of redemption. I think it explored a lot of
themes that appeared in his some of his scary movies but in a different
way, plus the score and the fact that Paul Schrader worked on the script.
A lot of classic names were attached to this movie, and I'm thrilled that
people can rediscover the movie. Even though we're not doing a huge documentary
like I'd do on another picture, it is worthy of a little bit of money
and giving to another life on DVD. And, now, George Litto the producer
owns it for foreign markets. So it is going to be released worldwide via
other distributors.
DF: Perhaps that is the best thing that has come out of the DVD format.
It provides a place for films that are not quite classics in the true
sense of the word - at the level of say a Citizen Kane - but are modern
classics and should not be lost to the midst of time and decay...
LB: There is a big difference between Europe and America in how
older films are treated. For example, Obsession, Dressed To Kill, Carrie,
Blow Out and Scarface were just re-released theatrically with brand new
prints in France. New poster campaigns, advertising, everything. That
would never happen in a million years in America. And these are huge releases
for library titles, so the only way you have to preserve these movies
is DVD. The only way these movies will ever see the light of day is DVD.
So why not pay tribute to them? Being a huge fan of Brian I felt a real
responsibility to crusade for them. Hopefully I was somewhat instrumental
in pointing out that these are movies people should see.

Special thanks to Laurent Bouzereau, Michael Cidoni,
Stacey Studebaker and all at MGM Home Entertainment.
|
|
 |


 |
Double exposure
Angie Dickenson (top) and Nancy Allen are on the wrong end of a psycho's
knife in 'Dressed To Kill' |
|
 |