|
This script is an adaptation of the story and not a
biographical picture. Was that a challenge for you as a
screenwriter, to boil it down to what's really important?
When I went to Brian (Grazer) and said I don't really
understand what a "Bio Pic" is. Because what you
do in that kind of picture is that you take four or five
poignant moments from someone's life and then you turn
it and you have an emotional experience and you suggest
that that's the truth of someone's life. Of course,
it's not.
So, I said what I'd like to do is do something inspired
by his life using the architecture God gave him which is
genius followed by madness followed by a Nobel Prize, which
is pretty extraordinary storytelling architecture, and then
hang evocative experiences off of that.
How often did you speak to John Nash when writing this
screenplay?
I spoke to him only after I wrote it. I was really trying
to build this idea of what it's like to have half your
world taken from you.
Part of what the story seems to say is that he used
the power of his mind to overcome the illness.
John believes that he got better through the power of his
mind. I don't know anyone who thinks you can think
your way out of schizophrenia except John. And I don't
think anyone really knows why people do or don't get
better. I think the movie tries to say that however you
get better - which is why the John in the movie is
still on medication - is probably a combination of
many things.
Were the delusions Nash experiences in the film your
inventions and creations or were they things that Nash told
you he'd gone through?
They were things I created to convey the experience of
mental illness. I tried to craft a delusional system that
seemed real and whole so that the audience would have a
sense
|